中国麻风皮肤病杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 389-390.doi: 10.12144/zgmfskin201907389

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

荧光染色法和氢氧化钾湿片法在诊断浅部真菌感染中的敏感度比较

杨颜龙1  张素敏2  易松柏1  周天玖1  张禁1   

  1. 1湖北省咸宁市解放军195医院皮肤科(全军皮肤病康复中心)，湖北咸宁，437100
    2湖北省咸宁市中心医院，湖北咸宁，437100
  • 出版日期:2019-07-15 发布日期:2019-07-11
  • 通讯作者: 张禁，E-mail: 195yiyuan@163.com

Comparasion of sensitivity between fluorescence staining and KOH wet method in the diagnosis of superficial fungal infection

YANG Yanlong1, ZHANG Sumin2, YI Songbai1, ZHOU Tianjiu1, ZHANG Jin1   

  1. 1. Dermatology Department of 195 Military Hospital in Hubei Xianning (Army Rehabilitation Center of Skin Disorder), Hubei Xianning 437100, China; 2. Central Hospital of Xianning,Hubei Xianning 437100, China
  • Online:2019-07-15 Published:2019-07-11
  • Contact: ZHANG Jin, E-mail: 195yiyuan@163.com

PDF (PC)

189

摘要： 目的：比较同视野下荧光染色法和氢氧化钾湿片法在诊断浅部真菌感染中的敏感度。方法：同视野下使用荧光染色法和氢氧化钾湿片法，分别观察466例浅部真菌感染患者真菌直接镜检结果，比较两种方法的阳性率。结果：荧光染色法阳性率为97.64%，氢氧化钾湿片法阳性率为91.42%，两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：荧光染色法较氢氧化钾湿片法敏感度高。

关键词: 荧光染色法, 氢氧化钾湿片法, 浅部真菌感染

Abstract: Objective: To compare the sensitivity between fluorescence staining and KOH wet method in the diagnosis of superficial fungal infection. Methods: Samples obtained from 466 patients with typical superficial fungal infection were stainned with fluorescence staining and KOH wet method, and the results were compared. Results: Positivity rates of fluorescence staining and KOH wet method were 97.64% and 91.42%, respectively, with a significant difference of P<0.05. Conclusion: Fluorescence staining is more sensitive than KOH wet method in the diagnosis of superficial fungal infection. 

Key words: fluorescence staining, KOH wet method, superficial fungal infection