中国麻风皮肤病杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 186-189.doi: 10.12144/zgmfskin202403186

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

永康市社区居民麻风防治知识来源途径及宣教效果调查分析

赵林华,施永跃   

  1. 浙江省永康市疾病预防控制中心，浙江永康，321300
  • 出版日期:2024-03-15 发布日期:2024-02-27

Investigation of knowledge source and education effect of leprosy prevention and control among 5183 community residents in Yongkang City

ZHAO Linhua, SHI Yongyue   

  1. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Yongkang, Yongkang 321300, China
  • Online:2024-03-15 Published:2024-02-27

PDF (PC)

37

摘要： 目的：了解社区及村居民麻风防治知识宣教效果与来源途径情况，为提高居民麻风防治知识知晓率提供参考依据。方法：运用自行设计的调查问卷，采取整群抽样方法调查5183名居民获取麻风防治知识来源，综合性健康教育干预历时3个月，对麻风防治核心知识知晓率进行干预前后调查，评价干预宣教效果。结果：5183名社区及村居民，麻风防治知识来源于手机网络占46.43%；报刊电视占45.51%；卫生宣教占39.69%；社区宣传占34.99%；亲朋好友占11.90%；黑板报张贴画占7.95%；其他途径占14.51%；从未接触过占10.19%。干预前麻风防治知识总体知晓率为52.88%，干预后总体知晓率为65.29%，经比较有统计学意义（χ2=327.154，P＜0.001）。结论：此次干预宣教取得明显效果，宣教干预是提升居民麻风防治知识知晓率的有效手段。

关键词: 居民, 麻风防治知识, 来源途径, 宣教效果, 调查分析

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effect and source of knowledge education on prevention and control of leprosy among community and village residents, and to provide reference for improving the awareness rate of knowledge on prevention and control of leprosy. Methods: The questionnaire was designed by ourselves to obtain the source of knowledge of leprosy prevention and control ,and 5183 residents aged 18-59 in Jiangnan Street and Zhiying Town of Yongkang City were selected by random sampling method.The comprehensive health education intervention lasted for 3 months, and the awareness rate of leprosy prevention and control core knowledge was investigated before and after intervention, and the effect of intervention education was evaluated. Results: Among 5183 community and village residents, the knowledge of leprosy prevention and control came from mobile network accounted for 46.43%, newspapers and television accounted for 45.51%, health education accounted for 39.69%, community publicity accounting for 34.99%, relatives and friends accounted for 11.90%, blackboard posters accounted for 7.95%, other ways accounted for 14.51%, and 10.19% had never been exposed. The overall awareness rate of leprosy prevention and control knowledge after intervention was 65.29%, which was higher than before intervention (52.88%), with a significant difference (χ2=327.154, P<0.001). Conclusions: The intervention and education achieved obvious effect, and the intervention is an effective means to improve the awareness rate of leprosy prevention and control knowledge.

Key words: residents, knowledge of leprosy control, source way, education effect, investigation and analysis