中国麻风皮肤病杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 11-14.doi: 10.12144/zgmfskin202601011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

强脉冲光治疗水光疗法后异物反应疗效评价

唐利1,孙彩虹2,陈宇华1,何梅1,刘博强3   

  1. 1四川大学附属成都市第二人民医院，医学美容中心，四川成都，610021；2空军军医大学西京医院第九八六医院，信息经管科，陕西西安，710032；3中国人民解放军991医院，湖北襄阳， 441021
  • 出版日期:2026-01-15 发布日期:2026-01-15

Efficacy of intense pulsed light in the treatment of foreign body reactions after mesotherapy

TANG Li1, SUN Caihong2, CHEN Yuhua1, HE Mei1, LIU Boqiang3   

  1. 1 Medical Cosmetic Center, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu 610021, China; 2 Department of Information Management, 986th Hospital of Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China; 3 991st Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Xiangyang 441021, China
  • Online:2026-01-15 Published:2026-01-15

PDF (PC)

16

摘要： 目的：评价强脉冲光治疗水光疗法后异物反应的疗效。方法：收集2022年10月至2024年10月我院强脉冲光治疗的21例水光疗法后异物反应患者病历资料。通过临床红斑评定量表（CEA）、医生整体评价法（PGA）、患者满意度及不良反应分析进行强脉冲光治疗疗效评价。结果：水光疗法后异物反应易发生在多次注射（18/21）、手针注射（16/21）、使用非三类医疗器械注射材料（21/21）的患者。强脉冲光治疗后随访1个月，CEA评分由3.00±0.837降至1.62±0.921（P＜0.01）；PGA显示整体改善率为95.2%（20/21），患者满意度为90.5%（19/21），治疗后未见不良反应或复发。结论：强脉冲光对早期红斑皮损的消退具有积极作用且安全性良好。

关键词: 强脉冲光, 水光疗法, 电子注射, 异物反应, 红斑

Abstract: Objective: To access the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) in the treatment of foreign body reactions after mesotherapy. Methods: The data of 21 patients with foreign body reactions after mesotherapy who received IPL treatment in our hospital from October 2022 to October 2024 were collected. The efficacy of IPL treatment was evaluated using the Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) scale, Physician Global Assessment (PGA), patient satisfaction, and analysis of adverse reactions. Results: Foreign body reactions after mesotherapy were prone to occur in cases with multiple injections (18/21), manual needle injections (16/21), and the use of injection materials that were not Class III medical devices (21/21). At one month of follow-up after IPL treatment, the CEA score decreased from 3.00±0.837 to 1.62±0.921 (P＜0.01); PGA showed an overall improvement rate of 95.2% (20/21), and patient satisfaction was 90.5% (19/21). No adverse reactions or recurrence were observed after treatment. Conclusion: IPL therapy has a positive effect on the resolution of early-stage erythematous lesions and demonstrates good safety.

Key words: intense pulsed light, mesotherapy, electronic injection, foreign body reactions, erythema