中国麻风皮肤病杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 257-260.doi: 10.12144/zgmfskin202304257

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学生对麻风早期症状和防治核心知识知晓度调查

徐锟1,魏晋2,谢宏强3,顾家徐3,张国成4   

  1. 1蚌埠医学院临床医学院，安徽蚌埠，233030；
    2南京医科大学公共卫生学院，江苏南京，211166；
    3安徽医科大学第一临床医学院，安徽合肥，230032；
    4中国医学科学院皮肤病医院，江苏南京，210042
  • 出版日期:2023-04-15 发布日期:2023-03-27

Investigation on the awareness of early symptoms and prevention knowledge of leprosy among medical students

XU Kun1, WEI Jin2, XIE Hongqiang3, GU Jiaxu3, ZHANG Guocheng4   

  1. 1 School of Clinical Medicine, Bengbu Medical College, Anhui 233030, China;
    2 School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China;
    3 The First Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Anhui 230032, China;
    4 Hospital of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanjing 210042, China

  • Online:2023-04-15 Published:2023-03-27

PDF (PC)

102

摘要： 目的：了解医学生对麻风防治核心知识知晓率现状。方法：采取分层随机抽样方法选取安徽医科大学、蚌埠医学院、皖南医学院、南京医科大学、苏州大学医学部5所医学院校的部分学生为研究对象进行问卷调查与统计分析，了解其对麻风防治核心知识和早期症状知晓情况及其获取来源。结果：5所高校2114名医学生纳入本研究。其麻风病核心知识总知晓率为58.18%。知晓组与非知晓组的年级差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），而知晓组与非知晓组的性别差异没有统计学意义（P≥0.05）。2114名调查对象中，早期症状答对≥3题者有489人，早期症状知晓率为23.13%。答对0题者有234人，占11.07%。获取麻风病防治相关知识的主要途径前三位依次为宣传资料（26.36%）、视频媒体（25.73%）和宣传活动（24.29%），有50名（2.24%）调查对象从未接触过麻风病防治核心知识。结论：高校医学生人群对麻风病防治核心知识知晓率偏低，应加强对该群体进行早期症状和核心知识的宣传教育工作。

关键词: 麻风, 医学生, 早期症状, 知晓率

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the current awareness rate of the core knowledge of leprosy prevention and control among medical students. Methods: The students from Anhui Medical University, Bengbu Medical College, Wannan Medical College, Nanjing Medical University and Soochow University Health Science Center were selected by stratified random sampling method. Results: A total of 2114 were included. The rate of the core knowledge of leprosy was 58.18%. There was a significant difference in grade between the aware group and the non-aware group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in gender between the aware group and the non-aware group (P≥0.05). The top three main ways to acquire knowledge were publicity materials (26.36%), video media (25.73%) and publicity activities (24.29%), and 50 respondents (2.24%) had never contacted the core knowledge of leprosy prevention and control. There were 489 students who answered questions correctly in early symptoms over 3 (23.13%) and 234 students (11.07%) answered 0 question correctly. Conclusion: The awareness rate of the core knowledge of leprosy prevention and control among medical students in different universities is low. It is necessary to strengthen the publicity and education of early symptoms and core knowledge for this population.

Key words: leprosy, medical students, early symptoms, awareness rate